Biafra
Prophecy At Play: Kanu’s Legal Team Withdraws—The Untold Stories of Trial Judge
In courtroom parlance, stepping away from the defence bar conveys a message. It says: “I trust no one but my conscience and my cause.” For many, this will be seen as a symbol of self-liberation. It is also perceived as a challenge to the established legal and political order.
EDITORIAL | Tracking Times
Introduction
There has been a dramatic turn of events within the courtroom. The nation’s legal-political landscape has shifted. The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has decided to defend himself. His legal team formally withdrew from his ongoing trial. Kanu is scheduled to open his defence at the Federal High Court in Abuja on 23 October 2025. His decision marks a salient moment both legally and symbolically. The situation unfolds with a prophetic word delivered by Pastor Maxwell Nnawuihe on 15 March 2025. It concerns the trial judge, James Kolawole Omotosho. This prophecy is now visibly manifesting in the case. Beyond legal manoeuvring, this moment calls for deep reflection. It highlights justice and fairness. The federal government must act without delay.
Legal Team Withdrawal: Facts and Implications
Nnamdi Kanu’s lead counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), had officially filed to withdraw from representing Kanu. He cited that “the defendant has taken this case back from us.”
Other senior advocates followed suit. The IPOB Leader, while in court, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, confirmed his intention to proceed without a lawyer for now.
The reasons are multi-layered:
- Kanu argues he has taken control of his case file. He has also taken control of his defence strategy. This signals a shift away from established defence lawyers to self-representation.
- He is contesting the jurisdiction of the court, the admissibility of evidence, and the fairness of the process itself. (The Guardian Nigeria)
- The withdrawal comes at a crucial time. Previously listed witnesses remain central to his defence strategy. These witnesses include high-profile political and military figures.
The withdrawal raises several consequences:
- Time pressure and procedural risk: Court rules may require timely opening of the defence. If Kanu delays, the court could move ahead without his input.
- Symbolic impact: Self-representation often signals deep distrust of the system and an appeal to broader public and international attention.
- Strategic flexibility: Kanu may believe he can personally control key narratives, especially regarding alleged state misconduct and rendition.
Defending Himself: Strategic, Symbolic or Both?
Kanu’s choice to defend himself is remarkable in Nigerian legal history and layered in meaning. It carries three major dimensions:
1. Strategic control
Vanguard had said that, by representing himself, Kanu can direct how key issues are addressed. These issues include jurisdiction, rendition, witness list, and state conduct. He has submitted motions that name high-profile figures (from governors to intelligence chiefs) as compellable witnesses.
This move places him in a position not just of a defendant. He is also the principal actor shaping the frame of the trial.
2. Symbolic defiance
In courtroom parlance, stepping away from the defence bar conveys a message. It says: “I trust no one but my conscience and my cause.” For many, this will be seen as a symbol of self-liberation. It is also perceived as a challenge to the established legal and political order.
3. Risk of vulnerability
Self-representation involves major risks. These include procedural mistakes and lack of legal advocacy experience. There is also the possibility of being out-maneuvered by prosecution or court technicalities. These risks reinforce why many legal experts view this move as daring, but potentially fragile.
Prophetic Broadcast: Maxwell Nnawuihe & Judge Omotosho
On 15 March 2025, Pastor Maxwell Nnawuihe delivered a prophetic broadcast. He mentioned Judge James Omotosho by name. He predicted that the judge’s courtroom would become a place of divine reckoning and national awakening in the Kanu trial.
While the full transcript remains unpublished, sources indicate he spoke of the “hidden counsel brought into light.” He also mentioned “the judge tasked by Heaven to release what has been held captive.”
Watch the broadcast video below, specially from frame 9:45
- You will also watch other viral prophetic broadcasts and videos by visiting Maxwell Nnawuihe YouTube channel.
Recently, news was published about Kanu’s defence team withdrawal. He intends to self-represent before Judge Omotosho. Many believe this prophecy is now visibly unfolding.
This alignment between spiritual word and legal event has strengthened the narrative among Kanu’s supporters. They believe that the case transcends the legal process. It is touching the realm of prophetic justice and national redemption.
Why the Federal Government Must Release Kanu Immediately
Given the circumstances, there is a compelling argument for the federal government of Nigeria to unconditionally and immediately release Nnamdi Kanu:
A. Judicial rulings in his favour
- The Court of Appeal’s judgment on 13 October 2022 declared his rendition to Nigeria unlawful. The court discharged and acquitted him. But the government of the day under late Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, did not obey the ruling.
- The United Nations Human Rights Group’s finding (30 March-8 April 2022) labelled his indefinite detention arbitrary.
- The Supreme Court’s December 2023 judgment, cited absence of extradition proceedings and unlawful abduction of Kanu from Kenya. But in a twist, the Apex court reinstated charges, which was also disturbing, but emphasised due process and legal fairness.
These legal milestones collectively suggest a foundation for reconsideration of his ongoing detention.
B. Human rights and health concerns
Kanu has repeatedly complained of lack of adequate medical care. He also mentions solitary confinement and conditions that undermine his right to a fair defence. His self-representation is partly an outcome of these conditions. The government’s refusal to guarantee his rights undermines Nigeria’s international credibility.
C. Symbolic national healing
Kanu remains a polarising figure. However, his release would send a powerful signal. It would show that Nigeria can uphold the rule of law. It also shows respect for minority voices and the ability to correct past wrongs. The trial has become more than a separatist case. It is a test of Nigeria’s commitment to justice. It also examines the nation’s inclusion and national unity.
D. Cost of further delay
Delaying release or prolonging the trial under such visibly contested conditions can fuel regional tensions. It can also deepen distrust in the judiciary. Moreover, it may invite international censure, including potential reputational damage.
Analysis: What Happens Next?
- Kanu opens his defence under self-representation. The court will assess whether his key witnesses are allowed. It will also determine whether the jurisdictional challenge is heard.
- The prosecution will intensify efforts to counter self-representation. They will push for orderly proceedings under Judge Omotosho’s direction. Judge Omotosho has warned that no extension will be granted. (Reuters)
- The government may face increasing domestic and international pressure to release Kanu. This is especially true as his self-representation gains traction. The prophetic narrative is also gaining traction.
From a faith-perspective, many observers believe that tomorrow’s session marks a tipping point. It is where the legal, political, and spiritual dimensions of this case converge.
Watch another viral prophetic broadcast by Pastor Maxwell Nnawuihe, which is already manifesting:
SECRET DATE HAS LEAKED! 4 Urgent Prophecies, Nnamdi Kanu Release
Conclusion
Nnamdi Kanu’s decision to withdraw his legal team is bold. His choice to defend himself under Judge James Omotosho’s courtroom is fraught with challenges. It is a legal gamble, a strategic statement and a prophetic sign all at once.
We examine the prophetic broadcast by Maxwell Nnawuihe. The listed witnesses bring clarity. There is an increasing demand for justice. This case is no longer just about one man. It is about Nigeria’s conscience, its judicial integrity and its national future.
The federal government’s path forward is simple and urgent. They must respect the rule of law. They should uphold Kanu’s rights. They need to release him unconditionally. To do otherwise would be to compromise the very foundations of justice in our nation.
ALSO READ:
- Nnamdi Kanu Lists Wike, Buratai, Malami, Umahi, Others as Witnesses
- Between Faith and Politics: The Church and Nigeria’s Conscience
“The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.” — John 1:5
Let Nigeria’s justice system become the light that shines—not the darkness it fears.