Connect with us

News & Politics

A Geopolitical Brotherhood And Restructuring Politics In Nigeria

Published

9 months ago

on

By AMINU JAHUN

THE recent appeal by the Patriots to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to convene a constitutional conference; the move by Dr Umar Ardo and like minds to set up a democratic league to politically and economically reinvent the North; and the reactive moves by the Middle Belt Forum against the league are deft moves in a geopolitical calculation to deflate or inflate the clout of the North in Nigerian politics.

Dr Bitrus Pogu, the president of the Middle Belt Forum, and a member of the Patriots, condemned the idea of one North, and attacked indirect rule as the main problem of Northern minorities, which, according to him, made them objects of manipulation and exploitation by the Sokoto Caliphs and the Mais of Borno. Dr Sunday Jonathan Akuns, a Plateau monarch, and a member of the Patriots also attacked the league as dead on arrival, and a put-off due to its Northern connotation.

In a communique after a two-day conference, the Coalition of Indigeneous Middle Belt Organisations, CIMBO, echoed the Patriots’ call for a people’s democratic constitution with a political agenda to restructure the nation into three regions: the North, the Middle Belt and the South, with the 2014 Constitutional Conference report as the foundation of the new constitution, which according to them, would facilitate peace and development.

REAF ALSO: Foreign military base, bandits and northern leaders

Nigeria’s economy stagnated – Bill Gates

Nigeria Is Not Meant To Exist, A Collateral Damage And British Royal Niger Corporation -Burna Boy

Whilst the communique is reactive to the formation of the League, the sameness of views by the Patriots, and prominent minority leaders from the North, can’t be accidentally coincidental. It could be the outcome of a strategic geopolitical initiative to trounce the North.

Aren’t the attacks of the vulnerable North, by leaders of the Middle Belt Forum, a high-stakes politicking to actualize a preplanned agenda of strangling the region?

Is the North really monolithic? If being monolithic connotes a big, undivided, and unchanging entity, then the North has never been monolithic. It was its non-monolithic nature which made the pacification of the Northern colonial territories difficult. And it was that non-monolithic character which made Northern minorities to revolt against the unifying tendencies of the Northern Peoples Congress, NPC, regarded as feudal and Islamic. It was that non-monolithic tendency which facilitated the emergence of NEPU, and the Borno Youth Movement. And it was that non-monolithic trait which split the region into 19 states.

Instead of attacking the stationery bandits, from all Nigerian ethnic and religious groups, who manipulate ethnic and religious fault lines, the Middle Belt leaders never relent in attacking a moribund institution, which was purely a colonial agency to attain colonial ends. Five decades after independence, indirect rule is still an object of attack, which has been turned into a wedge against Northern unity.

Besides the majority Northern ethnic groups singled out for attack by Dr Pogu, which ethnic nationality is free from accusations of ethnic domination? Only the small minority ethnic groups are free from the accusation. Besides the developmental impulse of new states, the unending quest for additional states, is fuelled by unfolding ethnic manipulation and marginalisation. New states produce new majority ethnic groups out of yesterday’s minority groups, who exploit and marginalise new minority ethnic groups. Those who accused others of domination yesterday, today lord it over other minority ethnic groups. Nigeria’s minority ethnic enclaves are defined by a perpetual reproduction of ethnic domination and oppression.

The geopolitical brotherhood of the Patriots and the Middle Belt Forum glossed over the fact that there is no constitution without defects. And since the 1960 and 1963 constitutions couldn’t prevent the tragic events in the First Republic, which culminated in a Civil War, which constitution would be effectively functional if its operators insist on subverting it? The self-corrective measures enshrined in the 1999 Constitution could ameliorate major constitutional defects, for the nation to forge ahead.

It was certainly tragic for the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, and the Action Group, for another region to be excised from the Western region. A geopolitical brotherhood across the Niger between the North and the East trounced the West, and created the Mid-West region in 1963. Six decades later, another geopolitical initiative between the Patriots and the Middle Belt, is set to trounce the North, pushing for restructuring the nation into three regions: the North, the Middle Belt, and the South. As it was tragic for the West then, should the diabolical brotherhood get support of the ruling cabals, it would be tragic for the North this time.

Should the geopolitical fraternity push its restructuring agenda, those considered settlers in the Belt, constituting a significant local population, could vote in a referendum against excising the Middle Belt out of the North. And should it be restructured out, they would constitute a sizeable community, who would later seek deliverance from ethnic and religious domination.

If the pioneer political class couldn’t liberate the minority ethnic groups( North and South), the military began that since 1967, when 12 ethnically and religiously compact states replaced the regions. And subsequent state-creation exercises deepened the liberation.

The Middle Belt Forum has glossed over the fact that the bane of the North, the Middle Belt, and the South are prebendal politicians fairly spread in the nation, who constitute a predatory class, who exploit the nation’s fault lines to advance selfish interests, opposed to those of ordinary Nigerians(of majority and minority ethnic extractions).

The League of Northern Democrats couldn’t have been formed at a better moment than now, when the North is overwhelmed by a high-stakes geopolitical collaboration to punish it for past commissions and omissions.

Post Views: 283
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Global Affairs

Iran–Israel War Escalates: Today’s Attacks, Trump’s Warning & Biblical Insights

The Iran–Israel conflict has surged into a full-fledged air war with growing humanitarian tolls. Trump’s evacuation call adds urgency and affects global stability.

Published

10 hours ago

on

June 17, 2025

By

Iran–Israel War Escalates in today’s Attacks

Latest Developments

  • Israel’s Operation Rising Lion launched coordinated airstrikes targeting Iran’s nuclear sites (Natanz, Isfahan, Fordow), key IRGC commanders, and missile infrastructure—including in Tehran—claiming “total air superiority” (theguardian.com).
  • Iran retaliated with over 300 missiles and drones, landing in Tel Aviv, Haifa, and other regions (apnews.com).

Current Casualties & Damage

  • Iran: Health Ministry reports 224 killed, ~1,277 injured; independent sources suggest up to 400+ deaths, many civilians, with extensive damage to city infrastructures—water, power, hospitals (theguardian.com).
  • Israel: Official sources confirm 24 civilian deaths, ~60–500 injured from Iranian strikes (apnews.com).

Official Statements

President Donald Trump

  • Urged all Tehran residents to vacate right away; left G7 early to address crisis (reuters.com).
  • Pushed for a “real deal” nuclear agreement with Iran, denying ceasefire claims (reuters.com).

Israeli Government (PM & IDF)

  • PM Netanyahu stated the operation will persist “as many days as needed to neutralize the threat”—emphasizing hits on nuclear/scientific and missile facilities (understandingwar.org).
  • The military claims destruction of 120 missile launchers (~1/3 of Iran’s stockpile) and “total air superiority” over Tehran (theguardian.com).

Iranian Response

Humanitarian Impact & Civilian Exodus

  • Over 100,000 Tehran residents have fled northwards to Mazandaran, Gilan, and Alborz provinces (en.wikipedia.org).
  • Reports of fuel shortages, hospital strain, internet blackouts, and psychological distress are emerging (en.wikipedia.org).

🔮 What’s Next?

  1. Further military escalation — Iran may strike U.S. or allies if intervention continues (understandingwar.org).
  2. Nuclear diplomacy in limbo — Iran paused talks pending Israeli ceasefire; Trump supports negotiation .
  3. Broader regional ripple effects — Proxy groups, including Hezbollah, Houthis, and Iraqi militias, could escalate (en.wikipedia.org).
  4. Global economic disruptions — Oil prices spiked after Tehran warnings; airlines diverted flights (en.wikipedia.org).

Biblical Perspective

  • Operation Rising Lion invokes Isaiah 31:4 (“As a lion… roars!”), reinforcing Israel’s belief in its God-given resolve (newarab.com).
  • Some Christian prophecy scholars see this as part of eschatological build-up (Ezekiel 38, Isaiah 17)—though cautioned by others to avoid hasty conclusions (forums.crosswalk.com).
  • Biblical themes abound: calls for justice, divine defense, and the lament over cities under siege echo Psalms and prophets (e.g., Lamentations 2:1; Joel 3:2). Prayer for peace and wisdom is urged.

Key Takeaways

  • The Iran–Israel conflict has surged into a full-fledged air war with growing humanitarian tolls.
  • Trump’s evacuation call adds urgency and affects global stability.
  • Expect continued conflict, potential negotiations, and regional escalation.
  • Many believers are interpreting the events through biblical lenses—prayers for peace are critical.
Post Views: 101
Continue Reading

Global Affairs

Israel-Iran Conflict: History, Latest Impact & Solutions–Trackingtimes

This opposition has led to covert operations and battlefield skirmishes across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen.

Published

1 day ago

on

June 16, 2025

By

Trackingtimes News & Politics

Historical Background

Since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, tensions with Israel have grown over Iran’s nuclear ambitions and support for proxy militias like Hezbollah. Israel has consistently opposed any perceived existential threat. This opposition has led to covert operations and battlefield skirmishes across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen. These conflicts are mostly orchestrated from the shadows. This rivalry has rarely escalated into full-scale war.

Most Recent Updates & Casualties

🛑 Israeli “Operation Rising Lion” (Started June 13)

  • Targets hit: Over 100 Iranian sites—including Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities, IRGC bases, missile production plants, Tehran’s Ministry of Defense HQ, and oil/fuel depots near Tehran (english.mathrubhumi.com, theguardian.com, en.wikipedia.org, wsj.com).
  • Casualties in Iran: At least 78–224 killed (including 20+ senior commanders such as Maj Gen Mohammad Bagheri, Gen Hossein Salami, Gen Gholam Ali Rashid, Gen Amir Ali Hajizadeh); 6–14 nuclear scientists killed; hundreds wounded; many civilians among victims (theguardian.com).
  • Notable death: Brigadier Gen Mehdi Rabbani and his family were killed in one strike (en.wikipedia.org).

🇮🇷 Iranian Retaliation

  • Missile & drone attacks: Waves launched at Tel Aviv and Haifa; 65 ballistic missiles and scores of drones fired (theguardian.com).
  • Casualties in Israel: At least 14–24 killed and ~390 injured; critical infrastructure—including a power plant and U.S. Embassy wing—was damaged (theguardian.com).

Official Statements

Iran – Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei

“Israel opened its wicked and blood‑stained hand… will receive a bitter and painful fate… severe punishment awaits.” (thedailyguardian.com)

Israel – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

“We acted pre‑emptively to prevent Iran’s nuclear bomb… we’ll do what we need to do. Regime change is possible.” (ft.com)

USA – President Donald Trump

“We were aware of the impending Israeli operation… working behind the scenes on a deal… vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran’s Supreme Leader… unprecedented retaliation if Iran targets the U.S.” (theguardian.com)

🌍 Regional & Global Impacts

Middle East

  • New proxy wars erupt across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen.
  • Oil markets surged, then stabilized—global energy remains vulnerable .
  • Gulf and NATO countries deploy military to deter escalation amid high tensions (theguardian.com).

USA

  • Supports Israel’s missile defenses and may deploy naval vessels.
  • Oil price fluctuations could worsen inflation.
  • Diplomatic pressure mounts with vetoes and summit-level interventions .

Africa

  • Rising oil prices strain developing economies.
  • Cargo and shipping risks impact African trade.
  • Diaspora populations in Africa may intensify local debates or protests via spiritual and cultural channels.

📖 Historical & Biblical Lens

  • Biblical parallels: Books like Ezekiel (chapters 38–39) discuss invasions from the North targeting Israel. Some interpret modern Iranian threats through this prophetic narrative.
  • Spiritual implications: Maxwell Nnawuihe’s teachings on justice, fearlessness, and faith echo strongly amid this crisis.
  • Economic ties: Faith & Fortune Finance’s messages on biblical stewardship and fiscal resilience are directly relevant as nations and individuals face uncertainty.

🕊️ Pathways to Peace

  1. U.N.-mediated ceasefire with verified arms monitoring to halt further strikes.
  2. Inclusive regional security framework involving Gulf states, Iraq, and Syria to reduce proxy aggression.
  3. Faith-driven diplomacy: Interfaith councils (Christian-Muslim-Jewish) promoting reconciliation, trust-building, and shared economic ventures.
  4. Economic resilience programs: Channel resources into reconstruction and economic stability—aligning with themes from Faith & Fortune Finance’s “Kingdom Wealth” strategy.
  • Faith & Fortune Finance’s content tied to economic resilience:
  • “Biblical Wealth Under Crisis”
  • “Kingdom Finances When Markets Shake”

Maxwell Nnawuihe’s video on prophetic motivation and fearless leadership:

“Courageous Voices Precede Peace”

Conclusion

This Israel–Iran conflict marks a historic escalation, with devastating strikes, high-profile casualties, and global political impact. Blending historical, biblical, and economic insight provides deeper understanding—and grounds your YouTube channels in relevance.

Post Views: 188
Continue Reading

Biafra

Tinubu Refused To Honour Our Agreement To Release Nnamdi Kanu After Election– Kanu’s Brother

Disclosing that the meeting had the blessing of the president, Emmanuel, however, lamented that Tinubu has refused to honour the pact by releasing his elder brother and the IPOB leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from the DSS dungeon in Abuja, Nigeria.

Published

6 months ago

on

January 3, 2025

By

Emmanuel Kanu, younger brother of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, has said they had an agreement with President Bola Tinubu for the release of his elder brother, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Emmanuel disclosed that he had the pact with Tinubu’s son, Seyi, in Abuja before the 2023 presidential election.

Disclosing that the meeting had the blessing of the president, Emmanuel, however, lamented that Tinubu has refused to honour the pact by releasing his elder brother and the IPOB leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from the DSS dungeon in Abuja, Nigeria.

According to him, it was agreed that IPOB would not bycott the polls on the condition that Tinubu would release Kanu if elected President.

Prince Emmanuel expressed disappointment that nearly two years after the emergence of Tinubu as President, his brother (Kanu), has continued to languish in detention despite the fact that the presiding Judge, Justice Binta Nyako, had since recused herself from the matter.

He said it was disappointing that those who claimed to be honourable, failed to keep their words.

The statement read:”Before the last election, I received a message from an ex-governor that Seyi the son of President Tinubu wanted to see me. I agreed to meet with him on the condition that the overriding priority and hence the fulcrum of our discussion will be the release of my brother. The meeting was held in Abuja in the presence of another individual whom I asked along to witness the deliberations and if need be provide independent verification should the need arise.

“Seyi confirmed to me that his father sanctioned the meeting and that I should consider any agreement we reach as binding on the then candidate Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

READ ALSO: BREAKING: Justice Binta Nyako Steps Down From Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial, As He Fearlessly Scolds Her For Disobeying Supreme Court’s Judgment

Biafra: Justice Binta Nyako Directs Tinubu-led Fed. Govt. And Nnamdi Kanu To Pursue Reconciliation

Nnamdi Kanu Facing The Most Violation Of Fundamental Human Rights In The World- Ohanaeze Youth Council.

“In good faith we agreed that I shall relay the outcome to my brother to reinforce the long held tradition of IPOB not interfering with the conduct of elections, either through boycott or any other form of civil disobedience. This understanding was duly communicated to my brother and he reaffirmed his commitment not to stop the elections or order any boycott.

“When President Tinubu as a candidate visited Owerri during his campaign, he too reiterated his commitment to facilitate the release of my brother if elected. We took his public statement as a tacit reaffirmation of the understanding I reached with his son Seyi.

“At the end, IPOB did not call for election boycott despite having the capacity to do so. IPOB also made sure that discordant voices urging election boycott were overcome because election boycotts would not reflect well on the reputation of a global movement that prides itself on adherence to democratic tenets.

“It therefore, defies logic that nearly two years after President Tinubu assumed the mantle of leadership in Nigeria, my brother is still in detention despite not having any charge against him. It’s been over three months now that Justice Binta Nyako recused herself from the case yet no new judge has been assigned the case.

“This is on top of the fact that Appeal Court had earlier discharged him of the sham charges and ordered his release which the previous regime of Buhari declined to obey.

“Supreme Court determination that his bail ought not to have been revoked has been ignored by the courts and the government. The latest insult is that Abuja courts of all persuasion are no longer willing to determine the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on merit but are rather relying on ludicrous and inapplicable technicalities to stall the timely determination of his cases.

“The truth is that Nigerian courts cannot, will not and do not have both the substantive and procedural jurisdiction to try him. His detention is without the backing of any known law in Nigeria or elsewhere in the world.”

Post Views: 341
Continue Reading

Trending